Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Silorane and Nanohybrid Composite Resins to Calcium Enriched Mixture Cement in Different Time Periods

fatemeh koohpeima, Fereshteh Sobhnamayan, Masoud Esfandiari, Saba Siabani


Statement of problem: It is crucial to select the best dental material for
restoration of teeth that undergo vital pulp therapy after endodontic treatment.
Objectives: Adhesion of composite resin and endodontic pulp capping
material affect the outcome of treatment. The aim of the present study is to
evaluate the adhesion of two different composite resins to calcium enriched
mixture (CEM).
Materials and Methods: We prepared a total of 60 cylindrical acrylic
blocks that contained a central hole (4 mm diameter and 2 mm height).
CEM cement was mixed according to the manufacturer’s instructions
and introduced into the holes. We stored 30 specimens for 3 days and the
remaining 30 specimens were stored for 7 days at 37ºC. The specimens were
further divided into 2 subgroups based on the composite resins that we used.
One subgroup of specimens was restored by Z350 (3M, ESP, St. Paul, MN,
USA) nanohybrid and the other restored by P90 (3M, ESP, St. Paul, MN,
USA) silorane based composite. Shear bond strengths were measured by a
universal testing machine. Failure modes of the samples were evaluated under
a stereomicroscope.
Results: At day 3, P90 had significantly higher shear bond strength than
Z350 (P=0.001). On day 7, Z350 had significantly higher shear bond strength
compared to P90 (P=0.004).
Conclusions: Within the limits of the present study, the best results of P90
silorane based composite filling after vital pulp therapy with CEM cement
biomaterial were obtained after 3 days, whereas the Z350 nanohybrid
composite showed better results on day 7.

Full Text:



Navarra, C.O., et al., Degree of conversion of Filtek Silorane Adhesive System and Clearfil SE Bond within the hybrid and adhesive layer: an in situ Raman analysis. dental materials, 2009. 25(9): p. 1178-1185.

Weinmann, W., C. Thalacker, and R. Guggenberger, Siloranes in dental composites. Dental Materials, 2005. 21(1): p. 68-74.

Ozel, E., Y. Korkmaz, and N. Attar, Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2008. 9(7): p. 65-72.

Sharafeddin, F., H. Nouri, and F. Koohpeima, The Effect of Temperature on Shear Bond Strength of Clearfil SE Bond and Adper Single Bond Adhesive Systems to Dentin. Journal of Dentistry, 2015. 16(1): p. 10.

Moszner, N. and U. Salz, New developments of polymeric dental composites. Progress in polymer science, 2001. 26(4): p. 535-576.

Moszner, N. and S. Klapdohr, Nanotechnology for dental composites. International Journal of Nanotechnology, 2004. 1(1-2): p. 130-156.

Mitra, S.B., D. Wu, and B.N. Holmes, An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2003. 134(10): p. 1382-1390.

Lee, S.-J., M. Monsef, and M. Torabinejad, Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. Journal of Endodontics, 1993. 19(11): p. 541-544.

Torabinejad, M., T. Watson, and T.P. Ford, Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material. Journal of endodontics, 1993. 19(12): p. 591-595.

Parirokh, M. and M. Torabinejad, Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. Journal of endodontics, 2010. 36(3): p. 400-413.

Aguilar, P. and P. Linsuwanont, Vital pulp therapy in vital permanent teeth with cariously exposed pulp: a systematic review. Journal of endodontics, 2011. 37(5): p. 581-587.

Mc Cabe, P., The clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. Journal of the Irish Dental Association, 2003. 49(4): p. 123.

Parirokh, M. and M. Torabinejad, Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. Journal of endodontics, 2010. 36(1): p. 16-27.

Asgary, S. and F.A. Kamrani, Antibacterial effects of five different root canal sealing materials. Journal of oral science, 2008. 50(4): p. 469-474.

Duarte, M.A.H., et al., pH and calcium ion release of 2 root-end filling materials. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2003. 95(3): p. 345-347.

Asgary, S., et al., The properties of a new endodontic material. Journal of Endodontics, 2008. 34(8): p. 990-993.

Asgary, S., et al., Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate's composition with Portland cements and a new endodontic cement. Journal of Endodontics, 2009. 35(2): p. 243-250.

Tabarsi, B., et al., A comparative study of dental pulp response to several pulpotomy agents. International endodontic journal, 2010. 43(7): p. 565-571.

Asgary, S., et al., A comparative study of histologic response to different pulp capping materials and a novel endodontic cement. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2008. 106(4): p. 609-614.

Asgary, S., Furcal perforation repair using calcium enriched mixture cement. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 2010. 13(3): p. 156.

Asgary, S. and S. Ehsani, Permanent molar pulpotomy with a new endodontic cement: A case series. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 2009. 12(1): p. 31.

Asgary, S., A. Nosrat, and A. Seifi, Management of inflammatory external root resorption by using calcium-enriched mixture cement: a case report. Journal of endodontics, 2011. 37(3): p. 411-413.

Asgary, S., M.J. Eghbal, and M. Parirokh, Sealing ability of a novel endodontic cement as a root‐end filling material. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2008. 87(3): p. 706-709.

Perdigão, J., et al., Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion. Sturdevant’s Art & Science of Operative Dentistry, 2002. 4: p. 237-68.

Tunç, E.Ş., Ş. Bayrak, and T. Eğilmez, The evaluation of bond strength of a composite and a compomer to white mineral trioxide aggregate with two different bonding systems. Journal of endodontics, 2008. 34(5): p. 603-605.

Oskoee, S.S., et al., Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin. The Journal ofContemporary Dental Practice, 2011. 12(6): p. 457-462.

Doozaneh, M., et al., Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer to Two Pulp Capping Materials. Iranian endodontic journal, 2017. 12(1): p. 103.

Feilzer, A.J., A.J. De Gee, and C.L. Davidson, Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1988. 59(3): p. 297-300.

Tate, W., K. Friedl, and J. Powers, Bond strength of composites to hybrid ionomers. Operative dentistry, 1996. 21: p. 147-152.

Oskoee, S.S., et al., Shear Bond Strength of Calcium Enriched Mixture Cement and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Composite Resin with Two Different Adhesive Systems. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 2014. 11(6): p. 665.

Sobhnamayan, F., et al., The Effect of Chlorhexidine on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Calcium-Enriched Mixture Cement. Iranian endodontic journal, 2015. 10(1): p. 59.

Bowen, R.L., K. Nemoto, and J.E. Rapson, Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: forces developing in composite materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc, 1983. 106(4): p. 475-7.

Ferracane, J., Current trends in dental composites. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, 1995. 6(4): p. 302-318.

Jaberi-Ansari, Z., et al., Bond strength of composite resin to pulp capping biomaterials after application of three different bonding systems. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2013. 7(3): p. 152.

Kayahan, M., et al., Effect of acid‐etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. International endodontic journal, 2009. 42(11): p. 1004-1014.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

pISSN :2383-3971              eISSN :2383-398X